Former South African pace legend Dale Steyn has once again sparked a lively cricket debate with his bold assessment of a leading Indian batter’s career trajectory. In his latest remarks, Steyn suggested that the star cricketer-known for his adaptability and consistency-could have easily piled up “many more centuries” had he been promoted to the top of the batting order earlier in his international journey.
Without naming the player directly, Steyn highlighted how batting position often shapes a player’s career records. He argued that the Indian star’s natural stroke-making ability, calmness under pressure, and elite skill set were tailor-made for opening the innings, where more overs and field restrictions offer greater scoring opportunities.
Steyn, who has faced the batter multiple times during his career, noted that the cricketer’s versatility often saw him shuffled across positions depending on team combinations and match situations. While that flexibility helped India in crucial matches, Steyn believes it may have limited the player’s milestone-scoring potential.
Cricket analysts have echoed that the player’s technique, marked by strong front-foot play, crisp timing, and the ability to anchor long innings, fits the profile of a modern opener. Some experts point to the explosive success the batter has shown when promoted in certain formats, reinforcing Steyn’s argument.
Fans on social media quickly reacted, reigniting long-standing discussions about player roles within the Indian lineup. Many agreed with Steyn’s perspective, while others defended the team management’s approach, citing India’s depth at the top and the need for experienced players in the middle order.
With India set for a packed cricket calendar in 2026, Steyn’s comments add an intriguing narrative to the ongoing conversation around India’s batting combinations, an area that continues to evolve with every series.
