The debate over potential venue changes in the ongoing T20 league has intensified after Mumbai Indians (MI) reportedly raised objections to Royal Challengers Bengaluru (RCB) using the DY Patil Stadium as an alternative home ground. In an exclusive development, MI sources have indicated that while they are not outright opposing the move, they believe “all other options should be exhausted first.”
The issue surfaced amid scheduling adjustments and logistical discussions triggered by venue constraints. With certain home grounds facing availability or operational challenges, the league governing body has been exploring neutral venues to ensure uninterrupted fixtures. DY Patil Stadium in Navi Mumbai emerged as a potential backup venue for RCB, prompting conversations among franchises.
According to insiders familiar with the discussions, MI’s position is rooted less in rivalry and more in principle. DY Patil has historically been associated with Mumbai-based teams and has served as a temporary home ground for MI during previous seasons. The franchise reportedly conveyed to the league that allowing another team to designate it as a primary alternative venue should come only after exploring geographically closer or more neutral options.
“Exhaust other available options first,” a source close to MI said, clarifying that the franchise is not seeking to block RCB but wants fairness and clarity in how venue reallocations are handled.
From RCB’s perspective, the need for a contingency venue stems from operational concerns beyond their control. The Bengaluru-based franchise is said to be cooperating with the league and assessing logistical feasibility, fan accessibility, and scheduling compatibility before any final decision is made.
The Board of Control for Cricket in India (BCCI) has not issued an official statement on the matter yet. However, league officials are believed to be carefully weighing competitive balance, travel fatigue, crowd dynamics, and commercial commitments before approving any venue switch.
DY Patil Stadium has long been considered one of the premier cricket venues in the Mumbai Metropolitan Region, known for its modern facilities and capacity to host high-profile matches. Given its location, it offers logistical advantages, including international connectivity and established infrastructure. However, hosting RCB there could alter home-away dynamics and impact fan distribution.
Cricket analysts note that venue politics are not uncommon in franchise tournaments, especially when scheduling complexities arise mid-season. Teams often guard their perceived home advantages while also navigating commercial interests and supporter expectations.
For now, discussions remain ongoing. The league management is expected to reach a consensus after consulting all stakeholders. Whether RCB ultimately shifts matches to DY Patil or another venue will likely depend on operational feasibility and broader tournament considerations.
What is clear, however, is that even off the field, the competitive spirit between MI and RCB continues to generate headlines this time in boardrooms rather than on the pitch.
